客户问题
Is the China route worth further time and testing?
中国是否是合适的路径？
当更多样品不是答案
围绕“中国是否是合适的路径？”重新梳理下一步决策
这是一个匿名化案例，展示如何围绕“中国是否是合适的路径？”把跨境项目问题拆解为更清晰的证据、边界和下一步。
01 · 当前决策
01
02
03
更清晰的问题，才能带来更好的下一步。
Is the China route worth further time and testing?
我们澄清了什么
The work distinguished product matching from adhesive-performance validation and showed which questions needed evidence before the buyer spent more on samples or development.
下一步决策路径
Directional Analysis → focused supplier screening → controlled sample validation
决策流程
透明可见的流程，让下一步判断更可靠。
公开案例以决策和证据关口的顺序呈现，不承诺供应商、报价或最终项目结果。
-
01
Frame the route
Define the China-side question before expanding the search.
-
02
Map capabilities
Separate product, process, and integration responsibilities.
-
03
Test assumptions
Check the evidence needed before more time or samples are committed.
-
04
Choose the gate
Move to focused screening, feasibility, or a protected pilot brief.
示意性公开流程。具体顺序会根据需求、可获得证据和已批准范围而调整。
客户情境
The buyer had reference products, several supplier conversations, and rising sample effort, but the product requirements and the evidence needed for the next decision were not yet separated.
我们做了什么
We split the flooring and adhesive workstreams, translated reference products into measurable requirements, and set staged gates for supplier identity, capability, targeted samples, testing, and pilot ordering.
工作澄清了什么
The work distinguished product matching from adhesive-performance validation and showed which questions needed evidence before the buyer spent more on samples or development.
决策影响
Continue conditionally: stop unscreened sampling, align the requirements, and move to focused supplier and sample checks.
范围边界
A desktop directional analysis. It did not include laboratory testing, supplier endorsement, certification, quotation, or a product-performance guarantee.
相关路径Directional Analysis → focused supplier screening → controlled sample validation
Start with a Directional Analysis
相关决策逻辑
查看此决策路径
此路径中的其他问题
